You referenced my role model! This is honestly one of my favorite pieces you’ve written. It gives a great and nuanced perspective on declarative writing. Finding good arguments from both sides and thriving in uncertainty. Great work!
I owe you a great deal for inspiring this article by questioning the ethics around sharing our thoughts online. Without your writing or conversation, this topic would likely never weigh on me, because all the content I consumed is biased to capture and retain attention, not question the consequences.
It's one of my most researched pieces. I sat on the topic for some time before I felt I knew enough to share my thoughts. Along the way, I had to pull myself out of some rabbit holes of censorship and freedom of expression—something I touched on, but might consider exploring deeper in the future.
But thank you. Exploring and writing on this topic was super rewarding from challenging me more than any other piece.
I love how you keep seeing that theme in my writing. If I am being honest I completely missed that my last article had that theme until you pointed it out 😂.
You could tell you did your research. Very well put together. I think it’s also a paradox with analytical thought. We do a lot of research but in the end, philosophy and analysis is just theory. But I think the stronger the research and sounder the logic, the better the theory. And then we test out those assumptions by posting them like you did and having them be judged by others in a dialogue.
But not every opinion should be considered. Only those that pass the test of logic. Did you ever argue a very rational point only to have someone ignore it a give you a parroted answer?
You referenced my role model! This is honestly one of my favorite pieces you’ve written. It gives a great and nuanced perspective on declarative writing. Finding good arguments from both sides and thriving in uncertainty. Great work!
Thank you so much!
I owe you a great deal for inspiring this article by questioning the ethics around sharing our thoughts online. Without your writing or conversation, this topic would likely never weigh on me, because all the content I consumed is biased to capture and retain attention, not question the consequences.
It's one of my most researched pieces. I sat on the topic for some time before I felt I knew enough to share my thoughts. Along the way, I had to pull myself out of some rabbit holes of censorship and freedom of expression—something I touched on, but might consider exploring deeper in the future.
But thank you. Exploring and writing on this topic was super rewarding from challenging me more than any other piece.
I love how you keep seeing that theme in my writing. If I am being honest I completely missed that my last article had that theme until you pointed it out 😂.
You could tell you did your research. Very well put together. I think it’s also a paradox with analytical thought. We do a lot of research but in the end, philosophy and analysis is just theory. But I think the stronger the research and sounder the logic, the better the theory. And then we test out those assumptions by posting them like you did and having them be judged by others in a dialogue.
But not every opinion should be considered. Only those that pass the test of logic. Did you ever argue a very rational point only to have someone ignore it a give you a parroted answer?